<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A South American Model for the Book of Mormon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/</link>
	<description>Stuff they don't talk about in Sunday School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fearaedo</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-13466</link>
		<dc:creator>fearaedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-13466</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2186&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Anthony E. Larson &lt;/a&gt; 

Could you please lead me to the Priddi&#039;s where abouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2186" rel="nofollow">@Anthony E. Larson </a> </p>
<p>Could you please lead me to the Priddi&#8217;s where abouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mormon Heretic &#187; Book of Mormon on the Baja</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-5532</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormon Heretic &#187; Book of Mormon on the Baja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-5532</guid>
		<description>[...] BOMC&#8217;s Great Lakes Theory, Ralph Olsen&#8217;s Malay Theory, and Venice Priddis&#8217; South American Setting.  My purpose in reviewing theories is to provide constructive criticism.  Some people have very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BOMC&#8217;s Great Lakes Theory, Ralph Olsen&#8217;s Malay Theory, and Venice Priddis&#8217; South American Setting.  My purpose in reviewing theories is to provide constructive criticism.  Some people have very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mormon Heretic &#187; Foundations of Book of Mormon Archaeology</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-5049</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormon Heretic &#187; Foundations of Book of Mormon Archaeology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-5049</guid>
		<description>[...] in Mesoamerica now.  Of course, I&#8217;ve talked previously about other theories, including South America, New York, and the Malay Theory, but Mesoamerica is by far the leading theory among Book of Mormon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Mesoamerica now.  Of course, I&#8217;ve talked previously about other theories, including South America, New York, and the Malay Theory, but Mesoamerica is by far the leading theory among Book of Mormon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A South American Setting for Book of Mormon at Mormon Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>A South American Setting for Book of Mormon at Mormon Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>[...] us over for family home evening, and introduced us to the idea that the Book of Mormon happened in South America.  I had never heard of this before, and became quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] us over for family home evening, and introduced us to the idea that the Book of Mormon happened in South America.  I had never heard of this before, and became quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mormon Heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormon Heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>Andrew, while I am sure there was some localized destruction, the BoM claims that many cities were rebuilt, so I think we should still be able to find some things.  Even Jericho was wiped out, but archaeologist have discovered it, and claim that an earthquake did level the city walls.  Candidates for Sodom and Gomorrah have been found, complete with ash from being burned.  So, I think it is still possible to find archaeology, despite destruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, while I am sure there was some localized destruction, the BoM claims that many cities were rebuilt, so I think we should still be able to find some things.  Even Jericho was wiped out, but archaeologist have discovered it, and claim that an earthquake did level the city walls.  Candidates for Sodom and Gomorrah have been found, complete with ash from being burned.  So, I think it is still possible to find archaeology, despite destruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>I tend to believe that the huge changes to the &quot;face of the land&quot; were large enough to effectively obscure any BC-era Nephite geography. Entire cities were sunk in the &quot;sea&quot;, cities were buried under &quot;mountains&quot;, smooth places became rough, etc. Whether or not this involved an event of sufficient size to shift a whole continental shelf is another matter, but nevertheless I don&#039;t think the land would now be recognizable to someone who lived there then. I&#039;m even inclined to think that Nephi and family may have embarked from Asia. I don&#039;t think most of these things will be resolved until we get direct revelation on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to believe that the huge changes to the &#8220;face of the land&#8221; were large enough to effectively obscure any BC-era Nephite geography. Entire cities were sunk in the &#8220;sea&#8221;, cities were buried under &#8220;mountains&#8221;, smooth places became rough, etc. Whether or not this involved an event of sufficient size to shift a whole continental shelf is another matter, but nevertheless I don&#8217;t think the land would now be recognizable to someone who lived there then. I&#8217;m even inclined to think that Nephi and family may have embarked from Asia. I don&#8217;t think most of these things will be resolved until we get direct revelation on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mormon Heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormon Heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>Firetag--interesting analysis.  You obviously are much better well-versed on continental shelves than I have.  As you know, I like to look at many theories, and I do not even rule out that we might be on the wrong continent.  You&#039;ll have to check my Lemba post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firetag&#8211;interesting analysis.  You obviously are much better well-versed on continental shelves than I have.  As you know, I like to look at many theories, and I do not even rule out that we might be on the wrong continent.  You&#8217;ll have to check my Lemba post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireTag</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>FireTag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree that is what he thought (the Yucatan ruins were discovered after the BofM was published); my point had more to do with the fact that a document written in the 1820&#039;s (the Book of Mormon) by a Spaulding-type explanation involving the best scientists of the day would have had no motivation to have tsunamis, volcanism, and earthquakes in the same geographic relationship to the Nephites.

Yet that geographic relationship appears to be possible in either NA or SA only in a location off the East Coast of Central America, where the Mayans have been suggested as the Nephites and Lamanites for entirely independent reasons. To see that this is a non-trivial test of the internal consistency of the Book, note from the USGS general earthquake and volcano hazards sites that its hard to find places on the WEST coast of either NA or SA where the combination of geophysical events associated with the catastrophy are NOT possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree that is what he thought (the Yucatan ruins were discovered after the BofM was published); my point had more to do with the fact that a document written in the 1820&#8242;s (the Book of Mormon) by a Spaulding-type explanation involving the best scientists of the day would have had no motivation to have tsunamis, volcanism, and earthquakes in the same geographic relationship to the Nephites.</p>
<p>Yet that geographic relationship appears to be possible in either NA or SA only in a location off the East Coast of Central America, where the Mayans have been suggested as the Nephites and Lamanites for entirely independent reasons. To see that this is a non-trivial test of the internal consistency of the Book, note from the USGS general earthquake and volcano hazards sites that its hard to find places on the WEST coast of either NA or SA where the combination of geophysical events associated with the catastrophy are NOT possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mormon Heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormon Heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>Firetag, thanks for the links.  I&#039;m not sure why your post ended up in my spam filter, but I was able to rescue it.

Joseph made many statements about geography, and I believe there were some references in Times and Seasons (which Joseph was editor of) claiming some Nephite cities were found in the Yucatan Peninsula, so I don&#039;t think we can rule out Joseph&#039;s beliefs in Central America.  (These ruins didn&#039;t date to the Nephite period, however.)  It seems pretty clear to me that Joseph believed that the BoM lands covered North and South America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firetag, thanks for the links.  I&#8217;m not sure why your post ended up in my spam filter, but I was able to rescue it.</p>
<p>Joseph made many statements about geography, and I believe there were some references in Times and Seasons (which Joseph was editor of) claiming some Nephite cities were found in the Yucatan Peninsula, so I don&#8217;t think we can rule out Joseph&#8217;s beliefs in Central America.  (These ruins didn&#8217;t date to the Nephite period, however.)  It seems pretty clear to me that Joseph believed that the BoM lands covered North and South America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireTag</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonheretic.org/2009/05/21/a-south-american-model-for-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>FireTag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonheretic.org/?p=493#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know if you caught the reports of the Honduras earthquake this week in regard to #4 above but this &lt;a href=&quot;http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqinthenews/2009/us2009heak/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; USGS link &lt;/a&gt; has some fascinating maps that show the kind of thing that could happen if a great earthquake along the same fault blew out the side of an inactive volcano along the edge of the continental shelf, collapsing it into the trench.

Although there is evidence of Holocene (post ice age) but otherwise undated volcanism on the small island at the lower left corner of the 3rd map on the report&#039;s map page, there&#039;s no evidence to say that such a collapse occurred 2000 years ago. However, I do find it interesting that Joseph described a crucifixion catastrophy that seems to require a combination of volcanism, earthquake, and tsunami that drowns cities on the EAST coast of Nephite lands, does more damage in the land northward than southward, occurs close enough to shore for pyroclastic flows to be over in about 3 hours, and occurs while winds blow the ash cloud consistently to the west for several days.

Despite knowing nothing about either plate tectonics or the Maya (and clearing NOT believing in a Central American theory in the 1820s), Joseph puts the Nephites in the geographical position that seems to require such a plate boundary. And the Caribbean Plate is the only plate with a boundary anywhere near the East Coast of either North or South America, and the tropics are where persistent winds blow toward the west.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if you caught the reports of the Honduras earthquake this week in regard to #4 above but this <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqinthenews/2009/us2009heak/" rel="nofollow"> USGS link </a> has some fascinating maps that show the kind of thing that could happen if a great earthquake along the same fault blew out the side of an inactive volcano along the edge of the continental shelf, collapsing it into the trench.</p>
<p>Although there is evidence of Holocene (post ice age) but otherwise undated volcanism on the small island at the lower left corner of the 3rd map on the report&#8217;s map page, there&#8217;s no evidence to say that such a collapse occurred 2000 years ago. However, I do find it interesting that Joseph described a crucifixion catastrophy that seems to require a combination of volcanism, earthquake, and tsunami that drowns cities on the EAST coast of Nephite lands, does more damage in the land northward than southward, occurs close enough to shore for pyroclastic flows to be over in about 3 hours, and occurs while winds blow the ash cloud consistently to the west for several days.</p>
<p>Despite knowing nothing about either plate tectonics or the Maya (and clearing NOT believing in a Central American theory in the 1820s), Joseph puts the Nephites in the geographical position that seems to require such a plate boundary. And the Caribbean Plate is the only plate with a boundary anywhere near the East Coast of either North or South America, and the tropics are where persistent winds blow toward the west.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

